Visual Hallucinations

Visual Hallucination
"To see is to believe"… until it isn't
The Incredulity of Saint Thomas by Caravaggio, c. 1602

Concepts — We assume:
-Vision = direct access to reality
-What we see = the external world
-Perception = truth

VH break this link
VH show the brain can generate convincing experiences w/o external input
Perception becomes internally driven, not sensory‑driven

Clinical importance
-Pure VH→ neuro > psych cause
-Especially common in PD/LBD due to cholinergic deficits, which reduce sensory precision & increase VH likelihood

Pathophysiology
VH emerge when:
-Sensory input is too weak
-Predictions are too strong
-Prediction errors are ignored or down‑weighted
→ A failure of perceptual updating

Expectancies
-Based on memory, context, intentions, emotions
>Hospital corridor at night→ expect a person
>Forest→ expect movement/animals
-If sensory data can’t correct predictions→ VH dominate

Sensory data
-If eyes/visual pathways provide strong data→ predictions get corrected
-If sensory data is weak→ predictions “win”
>Visual deprivation: darkness, eye disease, clutter→ major triggers

Attention sets the precision of sensory signals
-If attention leans toward expectations→ VH strengthens
-If attention is weak→ poor correction of faulty predictions
>Insight often decreases when attention and arousal drop

Object attention
-We choose which object to process deeply
>Dim room + chair + strong expectation of a person→ poor sensory input + poor object attention→ you see someone on the chair

Spatial attention — Orienting
-You move eyes/head toward expected location
-Strong expectation→ you “see” someone there even with minimal sensory evidence

Spatial attention — Modulating
-You boost peripheral sensitivity (often with anxiety)
-Ambiguous motion→ becomes an animal or figure (common in delirium)

Arousal
-Both very high and very low arousal increase VH risk
-Seen in sleep transitions, delirium, LBD fluctuations

Thalamocortical Synchrony
When disrupted:
-Prediction errors fail
-Updating fails
-Perception becomes unstable
→ fertile ground for VH

Trait & State
-VH = long‑term vulnerability + moment‑to‑moment instability
-Trait: memory‑based expectations, network degeneration, chronic attentional bias
-State: current predictions, sensory precision, arousal level, attention allocation

Why content varies (faces, animals, people)
-Because different higher‑level priors dominate:
>Faces→ fusiform face area bias (brain is hardwired to detect faces)
>Animals→ motion + biological form priors
>People→ social memory networks

Why patients often believe VH are real
-The same perceptual systems activate as if the object were truly present
-It’s not imagination — it’s perception without external input

Why VH are episodic
-VH need the “perfect storm”
-Weak input + strong predictions + attention shift + arousal fluctuation
→ explains waxing/waning in PD/LBD and delirium

Practical bedside triggers
-Dim lighting
-Fatigue
-Sensory deprivation
-Too much visual clutter
-Rapid changes in arousal
-Social isolation
-Small changes can flip the system from stable→ VH